Georgia Transportation Attorney Matthew Stoddard Quoted in Law360 on DCA Midair Collision and Federal Liability

Georgia wrongful death and transportation-injury attorney Matthew B. Stoddard, founder of The Stoddard Firm, was recently quoted in Law360 regarding the ongoing wrongful death lawsuits and National Transportation Safety Board’s (NTSB) final investigative findings of the deadly midair collision near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

The January 29, 2025, collision between a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter and a commercial passenger jet killed 67 people and has since become one of the most closely scrutinized aviation disasters in decades. The NTSB’s findings identify systemic safety failures by both the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the U.S. Army, raising serious questions about regulatory oversight, transportation safety, and legal accountability in complex, high-density transportation environments.

Stoddard’s comments reflect broader principles that frequently arise in catastrophic transportation injury and wrongful death cases, including those involving airports, public transit systems, and other transportation hubs.

Contact a Personal Injury Lawyer Now

Contact us or Call Us

NTSB Findings: Systemic Failures in Congested Airspace

In its final report, the NTSB concluded that the collision was the result of multiple, compounding failures rather than a single error. Among the most significant findings:

• The FAA approved helicopter routes that brought military aircraft into close proximity with commercial landing paths.
• Air traffic control procedures relied heavily on a “see-and-avoid” model in extremely congested airspace.
• Known longstanding safety concerns were not adequately addressed.

The NTSB characterized these issues as “systemic failures,” particularly in the management of air traffic around one of the nation’s most complex and heavily used airports.

Transportation systems — whether aviation, rail, or ground transit — depend on layered safety protocols, and when those systems fail at multiple levels, the consequences can be catastrophic.

Federal Government’s Admission of Partial Liability

One of the most legally significant developments in the aftermath of the crash came in December 2025, when the federal government admitted partial liability for breaching its duty of care.

In Law360, Stoddard noted the unusual nature of this admission:

“The government’s December admission of liability is significant and somewhat unusual this early in litigation. This filing ostensibly admits some fault and eliminates the need to prove the government’s fault at trial.”

At the same time, the government has asserted a number of defenses, including arguments related to sovereign immunity, causation, and the allocation of fault among other parties. According to Stoddard, these positions reflect the legal complexity that often arises in cases involving government agencies and large transportation systems.

“At the same time, however, the Justice Department claims that the air traffic controllers’ conduct did not cause the collision, that the United States is entitled to sovereign immunity on some claims, that potentially all claims are barred by immunity principles, and that some fault lies with parties other than the United States government.”

Such dynamics are familiar in transportation-related wrongful death cases, where multiple public and private entities may share overlapping responsibilities for safety.

Transportation Litigation and the Role of Investigations

Although NTSB conclusions are not admissible as evidence in civil trials, they play a critical role in shaping litigation. As Stoddard explained, the investigative record provides a framework for identifying witnesses, technical failures, and documentary evidence that must then be independently developed by the parties.

The NTSB’s factual findings — including communications records, flight data, maintenance documentation, and operational analysis — often become central reference points in litigation involving transportation accidents.

This investigative process mirrors what occurs in other major transportation injury cases, including those involving airports, mass transit systems, and commercial transportation providers.

Get a Consultation Now

Contact us or Call Us

Broader Implications for Transportation Safety and Accountability

While the DCA collision occurred in Washington, D.C., the underlying issues extend well beyond aviation and well beyond that region. Large transportation centers — by their nature — involve dense traffic, complex coordination, and overlapping lines of authority.

In Atlanta, similar challenges arise at major transportation hubs such as Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport and within the MARTA transit system, where safety depends on careful planning, clear procedures, and effective oversight.

Stoddard has represented multiple individuals and families in transportation-related incidents that occurred Hartsfield Jackson and also on the MARTA rail line. Such cases often involve:

• Multiple responsible entities
• Extensive regulatory frameworks
• Significant documentary and technical evidence
• Disputes over operational control and safety responsibility
• Immunity claims
• Extremely technical arguments that are difficult to make by those who do not have the appropriate background

When safety systems fail in these settings, the resulting injuries are often severe or fatal – one of the things Stoddard knows from his deep experience litigating these incidents as well as from his pilot training to become a private pilot.

Representing Families After Catastrophic Transportation Injuries

Cases involving catastrophic transportation injuries and wrongful death require careful, methodical investigation and a deep understanding of how complex systems operate — and fail.

The issues raised by the DCA midair collision reflect the same core concerns that arise in many serious transportation cases: accountability, transparency, and the need to identify and correct systemic safety failures.

At The Stoddard Firm, those principles guide the firm’s representation of individuals and families in serious injury and wrongful death cases involving transportation systems, defective products, and unsafe premises.

About The Stoddard Firm

Founded by Matthew B. Stoddard, The Stoddard Firm represents individuals and families in wrongful death and catastrophic personal injury cases primarily in Georgia. The firm focuses on cases involving complex liability issues, including transportation-related injuries, product failures, and unsafe premises, with an emphasis on accountability when safety systems fail.